THE ORIGIN OF TIME by Onyeji Nnaji
Time is one complicating issue to determine
in trying to work out the actual human genesis. The world in its nature also
contributed, for at the time when human beings were trying to gather themselves
from the flood incident it was almost very difficult to conclude whether the
whole part of the world was completely destroyed from the focal point of Noah,
the man through whom it pleased God to recycle Adam’s linage. From this
calculation in days as we found with the record about Noah, and which had
prevailed among his ancestors as the method of measuring time, it became
apparent that about the time when the entire earth was flooded, the human
society (particularly the created man) had adopted the cyclic rating of time by
morning, afternoon, evening; days and night as fits into the description by
Moses. According to our Bible story teachers, Adam was created on the sixth
day, invariably stressing the timely cyclic of day and night. This evokes a
salient question about what the condition of time used to be at the period when
there was no night; the period of the earth when darkness was far from it?
Generally the history of man has certain
element of distorted timing which gave rise to the decision to make man from
the earth. This distortion affected time majorly, as the divine timing eventually
took up a new calendar thereby giving rise to a more calculation that
apparently diverted man completely from the original counting as shown in the
record of Moses’ “genesis”. It was not so from the beginning; time were not in
days and night for the earliest human ancestors did not know darkness until
there was a fall that led to a change of intention by the creator, God. By
right, there is no how Middle East would have known time and spearhead the matters
of creation such as keeping a concrete document that explains the truth about
creation more than Africa. The reason is very obvious; the sons of God betrayed
themselves of thrust and the result was the creation of an earthly being.
Moses, perhaps, did not have a better insight about the original time when
there was no darkness, so in his writings he used day and night, month and
year. Jewish record insists that, for Mankind, Earthly Time began in 3760 B.C.;
approximately the time when Egyptian civilization began. We know the exact date
because, in the year 1992, the Jewish calendar counts the year 5752, while, this year the Jews record 5778 years. We may
however blame this mode of measuring time on the fact that at the time of the
Exodus, circa 1450 B.C., nowhere in the ancient world did an alphabetic script
yet existed. Sitchm insists that “for
Earth, Time began with the Celestial Battle”.
Now, what could be the original time from the
beginning? The original time should be the divine time. Thinking about the
divine time evokes such a question as, did God make the earth in days as Moses
had written or was Moses writing with reference to a term that requires mystic knowledge
to decode? If what the Psalmist and Peter wrote is true, then it is apparent
that Moses is not yet understood about the time of the genesis. From the book
of Peter, we have the following information.
But,
beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a
thousand years, and a thousand years as one day (2 Peter 3:8).
Divine
timing as shown here is approximated to one thousand years. In other words, a
millennium with man is but a day in the divine time. By this it would be that
from AD 0001 to 12.01pm of 31st December, 2000, the global history from the
birth of Jesus has lasted but for two days. If this calculation as revealed by
the Psalmist and Peter is what Moses means then he will be correct and germane to
other ancient tablets that have information about the creation of man. This
calculation will be correct because, it is the approximate estimation of
human’s live. From the creation of Adam, the generation of man had been very
close to a thousand year. In other words, God had proposed that man would live
for a millennium or more which is the same thing as just a day or two in the
divine time. If this idea is correct,
then Catherine Acholonu would be correct in her estimation of the pre Adam
period in the book, They Lived before
Adam, to be four thousand years. In other words, while time is calculated
in days because of the creation of Adam which was assumed to be in days
according to the Israeli oral tradition, other ancient tablets had measured
this same day(s) in the light of the divine days (divine timing). This is the
misconception which the intention of Moses to immortalize Israeli oral
tradition had brought to man.
The
misconception about the date of the creation of Adam formed the genesis of the
contortion of the human history from the genesis. We have sited some of such
information in the book, Reminiscence, another
in chapter one above; this time, the matter is particularly on the creation
time. Nnaji says,
The
human history is usually affected – particularly the origin of man – any time
any historian considers the creation story in years as was done by Moses in the
Genesis. This is the major challenge in deciphering the real information
bothering on creation. Estimating creation in years tents certain aspects of
the history, basically time. Time is the major difference between man and God
in the attempt to calculate creation.
(Reminiscence,
17).
I have always asked for where the
record lies about the day God created man as my children story teacher had told
us that man was created on the sixth day. I have sought for it in the bible but
could not find. According to the old King James Version of the scripture, the
same six day has conflicting information with the information on the fifth day.
Read Gen 1:23-24
and Gen 1:31. With this, western claim of fathering the knowledge of time
proves indistinct.
As early as (A.D. 354-430) for instance,
Augustine of Hippo, the Bishop in Roman Carthage was asked, "What is
time?" His answer was, "If no one asks me, I know what it is; if I
wish to explain what it is to him who asks me, I do not know." Augustine
can only explain time in the area it affected him, not generally as what time
originally connotes. The same situation has lingered in the human history. Time
has been misconstrued, misrepresented, misinterpreted and miscalculated; time
has been subjected to the mere instrument that formed the bases of the actions
of men; the entire human population notwithstanding. This problem is dominantly
in place because time has shifted from its original creation time. But time has
remained what it originally was in the beginning down here in the east. A
Sumerian tablet reveals that:
Before that ancient story of Creation shifts to the newly formed
Earth and evolution upon it, it is a
tale of stars, planets, celestial orbits; and the Time it deals with is Divine
Time. But once the focus shifts to Earth
and ultimately to Man upon it, the scale of Time also shifts—to an Earthly Time—to
a scale appropriate not only to Man's abode but also to one that Mankind could grasp and measure: Day, Month, Year (Stairway
14).
The Igbo of the east, who had been the
architect of the sun mystery that was popularized by the ancient Egyptians,
have three ways of calculating time. These three ways are Oge, Mgbe and Ogbo.
And the ancient historians had insisted that the time which is
associated with the creation of beings on earth is Ogbo. What informs the genuineness of the time formula in the Igbo
cosmological concept is the belief that their father existed before the
creation of the first man whom the Igbo insist that his name was Adama, not Adam.
Igbo use Oge
to denote specific time. To several other language equivalent expressions
which stress specific time, the Igbo equivalent of such expressions has always
explored Oge to show specific or
denotation. Words like: the appointed time, in the morning hours, evening
hours, farming time etc. are directly translated into Igbo language as: Oge akara’ ka, Oge ututu, Oge ngbede, Oge
oru-ugbo etc. With the use of Oge the
audience becomes dully, accurate and particularly informed about what the
speaker actually means. Ascribing time to the almighty to whom it is believed
to have control over all time, the
Igbo show this in the names given to their children. Popular among such names
includes Ogechi (God’s time).
References to Mgbe give a different idea in the Igbo cosmology.
The Igbo use Mgbe to denote time boundary other than being specific. It is used
to explain ideas that cut from certain period to another period. Also to end an
activity or a process, the Igbo use Mgbe to
make such denotation. Drawing this to the issue connected with creation, Mgbe is used to denote time span between
one thing created and another that succeeded it immediately. It is also used to
denote when a particular creation ended to give rise to another thing that was
created. Based on this denotation, Mgbe
cannot form the bases for the determination of the creation timing. Ogbo,
perhaps, would capture this notion better.
The
Igbo make use of Ogbo when the referent term does not denote exact time or time
boundary as experienced in the two paragraphs above. In the traditional Igbo
setting, Ogbo is used to denotatively remark a group of people in the
society that were born at the same time/period; usually a year. People born the
same year or period are believed to share similar affiliation within them.
Usually such affiliation may be that of the difficulty of surviving a war or
other remarkable dreaded circumstance that surrounded the birth place of the
group at their time of birth. This situation does inform the affinity and bond
that holds the set together. From such dominant circumstance the Igbo of the
traditional notion begin to number the days of the bearer, for the Igbo did not
adopt a concrete way of keeping the event in mind therefore enables them to vividly
say that such a group is thus and thus number of years. This was the concept
behind the formation of Age Grade as a social stratum in the Igbo society.
On the whole, Ogbo is used as the
English equivalent of a generation. The Igbo believe that Ogbo is the divine time
and that the whole universe and its contents were created in generations; not
in days. In other words, what Moses had considered as days – in the creation
story – were actually generations. This is the problem with the account of
Moses in the genesis story: the issue of time and how well time may be
estimated. Moses’ interpretation of creation as affairs of different days was
the genesis of the problem of timing. This also might be the reason he got
stuck in the issue concerning the day God created Adam. He only intoned the
related situation that led to the call for the creation of Adam, but could not
state clearly when. Do you know why? The mystery surrounding the creation of
the first man was not enshrined on the Egyptian tablets he had read the account
from. Achebe reveals the following:
Since
Igbo people did not construct a rigid and closely argued system of thought to
explain the universe and the place of man in it, preferring the metaphor of
myth and poetry, anyone seeking an insight into their world must seek it along
their own way. Some of these ways are folks-tales, proverbs, proper names,
rituals and festivals.
Even with
the earliest development of writing the Igbo remained furtive about their
knowledge of the universe. Rather than universalizing the mystery, the Igbo
fathers chose to enshrine this great knowledge in folks-tales, proverbs,
rituals, proper names and festivals. This makes it dully impossible for a
stranger to just ask questions and write what he thinks is the answer. I
remember what I went through while compiling the history of my small community,
Nkalaha. I had to revisit the rituals I once partook in as a child, listen to
festive songs and others. To end it up I offered a cola nut to the theosophist
who made a long incantation that embodies our history. According to the
theosophist, he would not tell the history ordinarily. The global history, in
terms of the origin of man, lies upon the chest of the priest king, Eze Nri;
the only priest whose is buried for seven days and exhumed before ordination.
Seeing all this, it is obvious that for the serial history of creation that
speaks of the accurate time to be documented, it would not be by a man who was on the
run. Moses did not have the deepest information, that was why he could not detail
the account of the sons of God in Genesis chapter six.
Now, time is
number and figure; but when it comes to the estimation of time for creation,
time shifts to the human life span. This we refer to as Ogbo, translated as
generation. The Igbo believe that time began with one. This represents the
first man created. This time, we do not refer to the man that was created from
the dust of the ground, we mean the earliest ancestor of the Igbo race (Eri)
who descended from the sky in the beginning of things on the earth. Eri formed
the foremost generation. The next time was two; another generation which became
the second. Another generation that became the third generation saw the
appearance of another set of ancestors. With these we have the three earliest ancestors of the Igbo race in the people of Eri, DiOka (the Awka) and Umudiala (headed by
Idu). These earliest population formed a triumvirate before the arrival of the
fourth generation. With the fourth generation, the first creation which was for
the sons of God ended. Speakings of the fourth generation over the rest of the
sons of God, the Egyptian tablet, The Nag
Hammadi says:
Then
the saviour created […] of them all – and the spirits of these [are manifestly]
superior, being blessed and varying in election – and also (he created) many
other beings, which have no king and are superior to everyone that was before
them. Consequently, four races exist. There are three that belong to the kings
of the eighth heaven. But the fourth race is kingless and perfect, being the
highest of all. (PP.
124-5).
And they
were four generations. These ancestors formed the foundation of Igbo pillar
whose cosmology is centered on four.
They have no king. Ask why, the same Egyptian tablet relates thus, “They
are kings. They are the immortal within the mortal” (p. 219). These ancestors
were immortal living before the first man created from the dust came to be.
Adama, as the Igbo history calls him, was created in the fifth generation. It
was a significant creation, first of its kind and the first ever that man came
from the earth other than the sky. Adam(a) was created from the part of the
soil that was red. See the following Israeli tablets below,
Adam originated from Adama—earth, which emphasizes his
insignificance, and from the word Adameh—similar (to the Upper One), which
emphasizes his eminence. (The Zohar, 127)
Adamah, from the
dust of the ground, dust, form within form (otherwise, from the most ethereal
portion of the refined element of earth, one within the other), (Jewish Cabbala.121).
To
record the event over the birth of the first earthly man, the Igbo assign
impetus to the number Five. The Igbo myths relate that
Adama was created from the dust of the earth in the fifth generation, which
invariably was the fifth day in the divine calendar. This part is not found in
mere history such that Moses could have read it in the Egyptians’ documents; it
was enshrined in the mystic pyramids in Nsude which was replanted in Saqqara by
Imhotep (according to Emily Teeter in Before
the Pyramids. Pyramids are elevated statue which demonstrate rising earth
in the nature of an anthill. The structure, which was dedicated to the earth
goddess, was mystically sculpted in strata: five distinct steps from base to
the top.
By
this it became indicative that the symbol for the earth is five. This aptitude is
demonstrated by the Igbo in two traditional concepts: when elders say prayers
and when the idea of Ikenga (the Igbo legend of the cosmos) is brought to mind.
Ikenga was the first human of the union between the sons of God and the
daughters of Adam to ascend to the sky; he saw no death. Therefore in the Igbo
tradition, five lobes of cola-nut epitomize his immortality in the Igbo
thought. It
is obvious when it is demonstrated dramatically as the Igbo affirm the prayers
said in their midst. If a kolanut is broken and the Igbo say prayers, as soon
as he mentions the blessings or wishes associated with lives, the attendants follow
suit to affirm them thus: Isee! Then, dramatically, everyone points his
fingers towards the soil, while those bearing staff strike them on the ground. This
idea (five) was also replayed by the priest-artist, Imhotep when he completed
the five stepped pyramid in Saqqara. But rather than imprint this in a clearer
way, he chose to give the mathematical formula as 3/2. Calculating this
fraction using Pythagoras theory, we arrive at five. This then became
the meaning of the pyramid which Egyptology could not decipher until the 21st
century when the symbols discovered in Abydos began to give insight into the
genesis of potteries, monuments, politics and even the Egyptians origin itself.
The eight
generation was also significant in the timing of the beginning. Seven is as
well significant; one, as the day the creation God rested. Eighth generation of
the human history was remarkable with the unlawful union between the daughters
of men and the Sons of god. The sons of God fell from their spiritual elevated
position when some of them took to the daughters of the created man for wives.
This was the biggest disappointment to God, after the war of the gods which led
to the creation of Adam(a). God was
deeply angry and He cursed them (Genesis 6: 1 - 9). Details of this union and
the repercussion to the sons of God are discussed in chapter three of Reminiscence. This fall of the African
fathers paid them with short life span; again, they lost their spiritual
potency and became mortals. The Igbo demonstrate this spiritual deprivation
through circumcision. The idea behind this act is that the Igbo ancestors
remained spirit men until the eighth generation. In the same way, a new child
remains spiritual till the seventh day, and on the eighth day he is welcomed
into the world of flesh via circumcisions. That is why seven has remained the
highest mystic height. See details in the book, Cosmic Chain “the mystery of the number Seven.
From the
foregoing discussion, it is apparent that what man calculates as days is not
actually days, but generations. In other words, what Moses had as the creation
story had been based on the divine date (generational days); it is not the
human actual days. It is pertinent to not that after the flood, the human
chronicle chart shifted from the generational days in Noah’s records. But it did
not change hand in the inner Africa. Of course, traditional Igbo society still
rate their time (particularly the human life time) with Ogbo, generations.
Time in the Post Flood
As contested
by Zachariah Sitchm, at the time when the Israelites were in Egypt, there was
nowhere in the world that had written alphabets existed. This is very true; but
we must accept the fact that, at that time, scripted arts had existed down here
in the east exhibiting certain mystic characters that fit mystic portrayals.
However we may refer to them as “codes”, we should remember that they served
the purposes of letters and they were retained till the modern era; they are
however not sustained as standard codes for contemporary letters. A good
example of them is Nsibidi which flourished
in the East and South-Eastern Nigeria. Nsibidi is made up of letters and
symbols (The history of Scripted Arts @ ajuede. Blogspot.com). The only reason
why Nsibidi is not widely known is because the scholars restricted its
knowledge to members of Ekpe scribes alone; again, the society did not see
their arts as what they too should know, rather they were seen as mystic
writings. The same was the situation
that prevailed in Egypt in the days of Pharaoh Naman. This situation eluded
several aspects of the ancient writings with respect to timing. What has been
used for rating the prehistory period is the historians’ Paleolithic era. This
period has been differently observed by different parts of the world depending
on the time evidences when proofs of the possibility of existence in the area
began to become visible.
The European historians rated Paleolithic era
from about 100,000 years ago. This cannot apply to the rest of the human
society of the time. For instance, the prehistoric times of China has been
rated from 1.7 million years ago down there in Asia. Coming to Anatolia,
Turkey, evidence of a civilization that dates up to 1000000 years are seen.
Strolling down to East Africa, towards the Ethiopia region, a storming
excavation was made of bones that evidently dated up to 4000000 years. While
the most astounding and recent discovering of 7000000 years skull in the region
of the chad basin in 10th July, 2002 has remained the oldest discovering of the
modern time. This latest discovery was made by the Michael Brunet led team of international
researchers powered by University of Poitier. From these ideas it becomes
apparent that the issue with time cannot be correctly resolved by westerners as
virtually all their historical data have fallen below the inestimable evidence
of the human dating in Africa; particularly West Africa.
The uniformity in the matter with times
compelled Joseph Fazing
to insist that Africa, especially “West”, did not have the complete circle of
the human development with respect to times. Discussing the development of iron
in Nigerian, he related thus,
Early
dates undoubtedly make the Taruga iron-smelting furnaces the earliest ones
known in West Africa until the Opi figures were produced. Some specialists on
this subject have seen them as evidence of an independent invention of iron
metallurgy in West Africa, but others, who have studied the technical aspects
of the question, have argued that this is unlikely since, except in Mauritania,
West Africa had no Bronze Age (Origin,
33).
Nsukka is a proof that, without any intermediate copper and
bronze metallurgy, it is possible for a late Stone Age people to know the use
of iron by themselves and mastered it so quickly without any outside influence.
The reason is simple; iron was fashioned to meet the various needs of the
society that fashioned it. Unlike bronze which were produced to sustain certain
cultural and historical evidences of a people, iron production was fashioned to
meet various social needs such as protection, showcasing of authority and
levels of attainment in the society and other reasons as the Nsude/Nsukka
civilization had proven to us. While this civilization was on, it was evident
that a similar activity was taking place around Okiwge region about that time. Flickers
of this view were unearthed in the excavations carried out in the early 1970s by a
team of archaeologists from the University of Nigeria, Nsukka led by Prof. F.N.
Anozie. These archaeologists found evidence of Prehistoric habitations of late
Stone Age people in Igbo land dating back to 500,000 B.C. and beyond. Their
excavations carried out in Ugwuele, Isiukwuato in Old Okigwe (present day Abia
State), makes a case for an Igbo-based earliest habitation of Homo Erectus in the world and that Igbo
land was the global industry of Stone Age tools that might have supplied other
parts of the world with hand-axes.
The surprise
of expertise in iron production in Western Africa, Nigeria was the reason for
this seeming confusion. It should be noted that the Stone Age which may be
dated back to over 2000000 years ago could not have usurped the rise of Bronze
Age simply because of the duration of the Nsude Stone Age civilization before
the offshoot of the later Nsukka civilization epitomized through the invention
of iron. For while Nsukka was initiating iron production in the intermediate
era, 700,000 – 520,000 B.C., Nri sustained the continuation of arts of Awka
technocrats through bronze prefabrication.
Every reasonable Igbo knows that at the time when the ancestors of
Nsukka have not arrived, Nri had existed for centuries (precisely three
thousand years). This situation made it difficult to determine the exact
genesis of iron in Nsukka. Another factor that may be argued to have delayed
the emergence of Bronze Age in Africa has been blamed upon the evolution of the
human population out of West Africa in the earliest time. Africa had Bronze
Age. The difficulty in determining time results from the fact that Africa. All
these reasons created the sharp contrast in the dates as shown below.
TIME
|
WEST
AFRICA: NIGERIA
|
ASIA:
CHINA
|
Dark Age
|
From the flood to about 2,270000
|
1,700000
|
Stone Age
(Nsude Civilization)
|
2000000 – around 800,000
|
500,000
|
Intermediate
Period
|
700,000 – 520,000
|
|
Early Iron
Age (Dunu Oka)
|
550,000 – 4,000 B.C.
|
|
Late Iron
Age (Opi Nsukka)
|
3450 B.C. – 0027 AD.
|
|
Late
Bronze Age (Nri Bronze).
|
0009 AD.
|
Curious
minds might ask, when was Nri known for Bronze? Thurstern Shaw found that there
was possible proof that Nri owns the bronze, not Igbo Ukwu. The owners of the
land in whom Shaw carried out his excavation are the Oraeri people who were the
offshoot of Nri kingdom.
They (Oreri people) also said that the ground where the
excavations were taking place used to lie in Oreri, but that the Igbo-Ukwu
people had captured it from them. I collected traditions in Igbo-Ukwu also
which confirmed the story. I mentioned this tradition in my interim report on
the excavations, but was strongly taken to task for doing so at a meeting
of the Igbo-Ukwu Local Council in 1964, to discuss a project for a
museum, since it was felt that any statement might endanger Igbo-Ukwu’s claim
to the land.
Great altercation between different members of the council
followed, finally quelled by the Chairman’s firm pronouncement: Of course
everybody knows that the Oreri people used to be on that land and that we drove
them back in war, and therefore we hold the land by right of conquest (Unearthing, 94).
Comments
Post a Comment