Reconciling Asadu and the Nsukka History of Origin - Onyeji Nnaji

Sometimes I find it very difficult to understand what could be the reason behind certain characters found among scholars, especially scholars of history in Africa. Every history scholar who had written in the 1980s and yonder had this character of repudiating every view that suggests that his language and cultural group could originate from among another African settlement. That is why a Yoruba man, after listening to his oral tradition, would still say they originated from one unknown place in the middle east. The same thing applies to the Benin who knew that it was Eze Nri who used to coronate Oba of Benin, yet they claim Egypt origin and elsewhere different from Igboland. In this essay I shall lead our readers through different hidden information about Ndigbo and then clarify issue concerning Asadu and the Nsukka Origin.

One thing I found in my study of prehistory is an unexplainable disdainful consideration of the Igbo race by both the Igbo themselves and the race of people around the world. Since the day I discovered this aptitude against Ndigbo I have been able to uncover several cultural properties belonging to the Igbo which were stolen and renamed to look different. To mention but a few, I found that Igbo was the first language on Earth; that writing system began in Igboland; that ancient Sumerian society, ancient Egypt, ancient dravidians etc. have Igbo in their lexicon; that the first, second and third civilization globally took effect in Igboland; that Ndigbo were the first to settle in Ethiopia, Nubia, Egypt and America. To see all these and many other history you may not have had more information about, visit the history page @ ajuede.com. If you still feel agitated then show me your critical points with proofs @ onyejinnaji@gmail.com so we can interact. 

Now let us cultivate on who's land we stand. I have read several publications in Journals, both hard copies and essays on the internet. I have also taken considerable time to go through all the comments on Facebook disputing the Origin of Nsukka, the same essay which I am the author. In all the comments, I could not find anything useful, instead I saw those who commented committedly insulting themselves. No scholar gains promotion by pugnacious writing. I don't even think if any scholarly journal would ever publish such abusive contributions as what I have seen on the internet. You don't have to insult anybody in order to prove a point. If you have a counter argument to whatever topic or claim anybody has written, you are supposed to do that with a comported dialogical style. Then show senses of your scholarship foundation by showing to your reader that you were schooled.

I am committed, perhaps it may be my calling, to unravelling several aspects of the Igbo history that have been forgotten. I have done so to many Igbo history; in the same way I did to the "Origin of Nsukka". In my writing, I refused to metion Asadu, Ideke or their ancestor, "Arum Ona" as the ancestor of Nsukka because they were none. I have known this because, when I documented the story of Onoja Obani in 2003, I visited the Attah kingdom in Ida. Ibiloma (bear with my spelling if it is not culturally correct) was the old man I was directed to be schooled. With him I found that Onoja was not a prince of any Attah, against what Adiele Afigbo, Okwoli, Okakachi and others had written about Onoja. Meeting with a chief priest in Ogurugu, my findings became easier when he showed me the Image of Onoja Oboni which I later saw at the UNN campus Nsukka. What I found practically is that, when some historians could not get to the foundation of their research, they simply look for any prominent figure around the history and claim he was the founder.

For instance, I have read an essay that claimed that Nri oral tradition said that Onoja Oboni was their father. This writer did not come in contact with Nri oral tradition. The reason is very simple, this glorious oral tradition of Nri was said, for the first time, at a court in Awka by Obalike the then Eze Nri in 1907. There is nothing in Nri history that reflects the activity of Onoja Oboni. Onoja passed through Nsukka areas, through Ama-Nkanu and lived and died in Nkalaha. There was however an aspect of his name mentioned around the Anambra axis. As a legend, Onoja moved with followers. When he travelled to the Nri axis, some of his men remained there and formed a village (probably a community by now). They are called "Umuekete". You can do me a favour to verify. That was what some writers lay claim to and conclude that Onoja peopled Nri. Does a child people his grandparents? I think not.

Asadu Ideke became a stumbling block to Nsukka historians to check against those who do not have enough time or did not want to get primary information. The reason I went to Nri and Ida was to justify the potency of what Prof. James Onwuejiogwu said about Nri and the information contained in Nkalaha about Onoja Oboni respectively. I commit myself to getting to the root of any history in my possession so that I can write what my predecessors had never discovered about the people concerned. You can check from all the history topic published on this site. So, to ward off every doubt about what you will read down page, I will require you to read the history of the Tiv first before completing this essay.

From the study of the settlement of the Tivs, it is uncovered that in the beginning, Igbo people settled down to the Kastina Ala river. This is a distance far northward. This will help our understanding a little. As we have indicated in The Peopling of Ancient Nsukka, movement away from the ancient Nsukka started from the middle age of the Nsukka civilization. Meanwhile, before this medieval period, pygmies scholars had left  Umudiala and journied through the Sahara plane to settle far away from Igboland. Among these were the founders of Egypt and walker-travellers who laid the foundation of Ethiopia. Walker-travellers, traditionally known as "Ndi Ojukwu", were the first to settle at the Afar region of Ethiopia and they are called "Kambata". Therefore at the decay stage of Nsukka civilization and below (Around 4000BC and below, according to the Oxford University spectrometer), the need to spread resumed for the population that saw the civilization. By this time, Ida had never settled. Before this time, the population that founded Arochukwu had left Ero in Nsukka to settle in the Ibibio territory. Even Afigbo himself had tried to solve this misconception when he remarked this,

Those who have any acquittance with any Igbo community know that the Igbo political system and it's characteristic wide diffusion of political authority and rights through the component segments is unlike the Igala and Yoruba system as anything could be. And one characteristic of the Igbo is the general similarity of their political organization in this respect... Thus, the Nsukka political system was not the Igala system and could not have been... (Rope 69-70). 

The emergence and settlement of the Ida ancestor took effect several thousand years after the resettlement of the Igbo territories in the aftermath of the flood events. For as currently uncovered, it was not the Asadu in the chain of Nsukka regeneration ancestry that founded Ida. This is even clearer, for at the time when Nsukka was flourishing in her prominent civilization, Ida was not born. We began to hear about Ida dating back to the days after the resettlement of the Jukuns. And, as we have indicated in the Origin o of the Jukun, their resettlement took effect in the days when King Ezeana was terrorizing the dwellers of the Nile region. A time around 300AD. The Jukun had settled far long before the Asadu led population settled in Ida. This was why, at the time of Ata Ayegba, the Jukun hired the Abam warriors from Eda to fight Ida; but on discovering that Ida were the Asadus, the Abam warriors withdrew. This aspect of the Jukun's history was mentioned first by Afigbo.

One gets confused by focusing on the history of Ida alone. No; there is always the need to look into the oral history of the settlers in the boundaries; for, if not thoroughly detailed, the boundary dwellers may have certain aspect of the neighbours' history that clarify the area that had been made contorted by the handlers of the oral history. The history of the settlement of Ida, on the area it concerns the period of their settlement, should rather be sorted in comparison with the history of their encounters with her neighbours since no people settle in a place without the notice of the boundary members. So, following the ridiculous claims found with some Igala writers, historians may conclude that they were older than the Jukun. But it is not true. Back then in 2012 through 13, many sites held to the claim that Ida settled in 6AD. We all know that this was not true. It rather became confusing as they have no iota evidence of any encounter with the Oba of Benin who ravaged the area during the 1440s empire inversions.

Now, if anyone bearing Asadu had travelled to Nsukka and probably had children, it is not a reason for the entire Nsukka to be reckoned to him as their ancestor. Even if it was the very Asadu known in the series of the Nsukka ancestry that had come from Ida (assuming it was possible), how come that his father and the rest of his ancestors all bore Igbo names? This is one clever question that would help any reasonable researcher to land safely. One should ask where were the Ida during the 500,000 to 4000BC years of a civilization in Nsukka? If this is answered, then the researcher can hold his pen properly to write with authority. 

In summary therefore, we cannot speak of a person without asking about his father. That is why history always spontaneously ask, "...the son of who...?" Everybody has where he comes from, but when the issue of origin is called to mind, attention moves to geneology. That is what defines ancestry. The people who concluded on Asadu for Nsukka ancestry made a huge mistake. If they had thought it well, they wouldn't have paid attention to ancestor of Asadu or probably have burried such names as "Arumu" and "Ona" to Oblivion. But since they could not do this, their claims are defeated and would hold no water. Take time to study such heavy borrowing of Igbo culture as found among the Igala and ask yourself how it would be possible if Igala were not Igbo in the beginning. But this is far from claims, for all I care, no Igala historian would tell you that the original name of his people were "IGARA" which is the Igbo word for attempted adventure. Again, he will naver tell you that the father of Ida was "Odu Ida", an Ida fashoner from Nsukka. These and many more mind-blowing discovering made on the lost parts of the Igbo history as shown in the Origin of Igbo Race compiled by me. If they were not Igbo, then everything may follow the views of P.O. Okwoli that the Igala and Igbo may have had a lasting contact in the past. If nothing remains that could rehearse this heavy influence, the unique four market structure will stand tall like a monument. Other proofs are names of terms in both cultures are shown below.

Igbo       Meaning .      Igala .     Meaning

Ewu       goat .               Ewo.       goat

Akpi.     Scorpion.        Akpe .     Scorpion

Eze.       King .               Eje.          Royal title

Oshimili  river       Ohimini     River

Ugo           Eagle        Ugo             Eagle

Agwa         Beans      Egwa          Beans

Ugu.        Pumpkin    Ugwu          pumpkin

Akpa.        Bag .         Ikpa.            Bag

Akwa.       Cry .         Akwu.           Cry

Ani.            Land.       Ane.             Land

Okwute .      Stone.        Okwuta.      Stone

Ezi.             Pig .           Ehi .             Pig

Imi             nose .         Imo.            Nose etc.

From the foregoing, it is apparent that Igala shows more evidence of Igbo than their claimed ancestral home, Benin. Please stop the damage on our history; Nsukka did not descend from Igala people. That was how Anioma claimed that their father held from Benin, yet his name was Eze Chime; Ikwerre also claimed they migrated from Benin, yet their father was Akalaka. Who did this to us? We have an exception however in the people of Umuonoja. There are two conflicting names for their ancestry. We identified Onoja Edeoga and Onoja Eze. The former was an Nsukka man while the latter was the popular Onoja Oboni known to many historians. Those begotten by Onoja Eze are clearly known to have Igala ancestry because they emerged through the woman Onoja slept with during his days in hobo. From the information reaching me in appreciation, I have been reliably informed that both the Umuonoja in Nkalaha and those in Nsukka had met to know themselves as the descendants of Onoja Eze otherwise called Onoja Obani.

Make your comments with references.